NIWA Community Forums

NIWA Community => Nintendo Gaming => Topic started by: tacopill on February 02, 2011, 08:58:09 PM

Title: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 02, 2011, 08:58:09 PM
Was over at IGN, reading up on the interest article, We Want Nintendo vs. Capcom!! (http://wii.ign.com/articles/114/1147008p1.html), and this got me thinking, I want it as well!

Of the stuff brought up in the article, i think a hybrid system of Smash Bros.- and the Capcom Vs.-Systems would work best, but i would be open to the possibility of either system being used; with the other company's games coming in as "guests".

Opinions?

Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Mari-Illustrious-Makinami on February 02, 2011, 11:09:00 PM
How interesting... (http://www.cubed3.com/news/15105)
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Tattletale1 on February 04, 2011, 05:54:31 PM
Capcom vs. Nintendo vs. Konami vs. Square Enix vs. Sega & Marvel,
Devoloped by Capcom & Sega, possibly with Sakurai's input,
Konami - Solid Snake
Square Enix - Sora,
Sega - Marvel Comics Heroes, Sonic, & NiGHTS,
Disney - Aron Stone (If Disney uses any of their own Characters)
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 05, 2011, 01:46:19 AM
Quote from: Tattletale1 on February 04, 2011, 05:54:31 PM
Capcom vs. Nintendo vs. Konami vs. Square Enix vs. Sega & Marvel,
Devoloped by Capcom & Sega, possibly with Sakurai's input,
Konami - Solid Snake
Square Enix - Sora,
Sega - Marvel Comics Heroes, Sonic, & NiGHTS,
Disney - Aron Stone (If Disney uses any of their own Characters)

I apologize if this is clichéd, but i am now singing Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3Nqguav6nE).

Anyway, throw on DC, MK, and a few others, and you will be set. And what do you mean by "possibly with Sakurai's input"?

Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Tattletale1 on February 07, 2011, 04:01:45 PM
Quote from: tacopill on February 05, 2011, 01:46:19 AM
Anyway, throw on DC, MK, and a few others, and you will be set. And what do you mean by "possibly with Sakurai's input"?



Sakurai might be invited to Iwata asks before the game is finnished, so he could comment on the game, and the 3ds system
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Manga Maniac on February 08, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Quote from: Tattletale1 on February 04, 2011, 05:54:31 PM
Square Enix - Sora,
Don't forget the Black Mage! Who better to put in a fighting game than da guy who cast da magic wich makes da peoplez fall down? And hopefully the Red Mage too. Unless they only have actual characters from Final Fantasy, in which case I think all the named non-special heroes from Dissidia would be in it.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 10, 2011, 12:06:30 AM
Quote from: Tattletale1 on February 07, 2011, 04:01:45 PM
Quote from: tacopill on February 05, 2011, 01:46:19 AM
Anyway, throw on DC, MK, and a few others, and you will be set. And what do you mean by "possibly with Sakurai's input"?



Sakurai might be invited to Iwata asks before the game is finnished, so he could comment on the game, and the 3ds system

Ah, that makes sense.
Quote from: Manga Maniac on February 08, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Quote from: Tattletale1 on February 04, 2011, 05:54:31 PM
Square Enix - Sora,
Don't forget the Black Mage! Who better to put in a fighting game than da guy who cast da magic wich makes da peoplez fall down? And hopefully the Red Mage too. Unless they only have actual characters from Final Fantasy, in which case I think all the named non-special heroes from Dissidia would be in it.

Yes! Mages!!!!!

I wonder if a  Chameleon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mortal_Kombat_characters#Introduced_in_Mortal_Kombat_3_and_updates)-like character would be accepted...
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Mari-Illustrious-Makinami on February 10, 2011, 03:19:00 AM
Quote from: Manga Maniac on February 08, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Quote from: Tattletale1 on February 04, 2011, 05:54:31 PM
Square Enix - Sora,
Don't forget the Black Mage! Who better to put in a fighting game than da guy who cast da magic wich makes da peoplez fall down? And hopefully the Red Mage too. Unless they only have actual characters from Final Fantasy, in which case I think all the named non-special heroes from Dissidia would be in it.
I LIKE WHITE MAGE MOAR. D:<
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 11, 2011, 12:08:25 AM
Quote from: Aiko-chan on February 10, 2011, 03:19:00 AM
Quote from: Manga Maniac on February 08, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Quote from: Tattletale1 on February 04, 2011, 05:54:31 PM
Square Enix - Sora,
Don't forget the Black Mage! Who better to put in a fighting game than da guy who cast da magic wich makes da peoplez fall down? And hopefully the Red Mage too. Unless they only have actual characters from Final Fantasy, in which case I think all the named non-special heroes from Dissidia would be in it.
I LIKE WHITE MAGE MOAR. D:<

So, you're a color-ist?
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Mari-Illustrious-Makinami on February 13, 2011, 06:54:03 AM
No White Mage is sexier.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: R7308xx on February 13, 2011, 07:15:00 AM
SLIME!!!

But srsly, these should be in a collab.

Square Enix- Ninja, White Mage, Black Mage, Slime, Sora, Riku, Crono
Capcom- Arthur, Chun Li, Ryu, Amaterasu, Chris Redfield, Jill Valentine, Amaterasu, Zero
Konami- Simon Belmont, Alucard, Solid Snake, Bill R.
Sega- Sonic, Tails, NiGHTS, Reala
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 13, 2011, 04:58:42 PM
Quote from: RamblinEvilMushroom on February 13, 2011, 07:15:00 AM
SLIME!!!

But srsly, these should be in a collab.

Square Enix- Ninja, White Mage, Black Mage, Slime, Sora, Riku, Crono
Capcom- Arthur, Chun Li, Ryu, Amaterasu, Chris Redfield, Jill Valentine, Amaterasu, Zero
Konami- Simon Belmont, Alucard, Solid Snake, Bill R.
Sega- Sonic, Tails, NiGHTS, Reala


That would be cool. All of them.

What would it be called?

Capcom vs. Smash Bros. vs. ?
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: BooDestroyer on February 13, 2011, 05:03:15 PM
I didn't know that the Nintendo company was known as the Smash Bros. company.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 13, 2011, 06:13:46 PM
Quote from: BooDestroyer on February 13, 2011, 05:03:15 PM
I didn't know that the Nintendo company was known as the Smash Bros. company.

It's not. I was combining the Titles "Capcom vs." and "Smash Bros."
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: pikachu8090 on February 13, 2011, 09:17:46 PM
you mean like have one mode that is in capcom vs. style and the other smashbros
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 13, 2011, 10:04:27 PM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 13, 2011, 09:17:46 PM
you mean like have one mode that is in capcom vs. style and the other smashbros

that could work well as well.

But what i was speaking of was specifically the title, not the fighting-engine style.

The title of the capcom fighting games, are always "Capcom vs. <some other company>". I took this and combined it with "Smash Bros."

you could also call it "Capcom vs. Nintendo"; although, i don't know if Nintendo would take second-string.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Mari-Illustrious-Makinami on February 15, 2011, 02:27:59 AM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
No shit, Sherlock.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 02:57:54 AM
Quote from: Aiko-chan on February 15, 2011, 02:27:59 AM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
No s***, Sherlock.
dont have to rub it in my face
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on February 15, 2011, 08:27:55 PM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 02:57:54 AM
Quote from: Aiko-chan on February 15, 2011, 02:27:59 AM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
No s***, Sherlock.
dont have to rub it in my face

yes, that was Highly unnecessary...
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: HavocReaper48 on March 13, 2011, 03:26:08 PM
Quote from: tacopill on February 15, 2011, 08:27:55 PM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 02:57:54 AM
Quote from: Aiko-chan on February 15, 2011, 02:27:59 AM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
No s***, Sherlock.
dont have to rub it in my face
yes, that was Highly unnecessary...
(http://www.cultofmac.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/phoenix-wright-objection.jpg)

On Xbox 360 / PS3 would be better simply because they are technologically superior -- less laggy for online matches for example -- and can utilize DLC to put in even moar characters. Now, I'm not saying "HAY GAIZ WII SUX", but I think the other two consoles would be better. I mean, just look at MvC3.

Or at least, one version for 360/PS3 and a watered down port for Wii.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on March 13, 2011, 07:11:46 PM
Quote from: HavocReaper48 on March 13, 2011, 03:26:08 PM
Quote from: tacopill on February 15, 2011, 08:27:55 PM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 02:57:54 AM
Quote from: Aiko-chan on February 15, 2011, 02:27:59 AM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
No s***, Sherlock.
dont have to rub it in my face
yes, that was Highly unnecessary...
(http://www.cultofmac.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/phoenix-wright-objection.jpg)

On Xbox 360 / PS3 would be better simply because they are technologically superior -- less laggy for online matches for example -- and can utilize DLC to put in even moar characters. Now, I'm not saying "HAY GAIZ WII SUX", but I think the other two consoles would be better. I mean, just look at MvC3.

Or at least, one version for 360/PS3 and a watered down port for Wii.

But would Nintendo be willing to partner up on a game that they know would be going to non-Nintendo Console?

I mean, Nintendo has done it before. But those were the rare exception, with a specific condition (like the game being educational)l.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Tattletale1 on March 21, 2011, 09:19:07 PM
Quote from: tacopill on March 13, 2011, 07:11:46 PM


But would Nintendo be willing to partner up on a game that they know would be going to non-Nintendo Console?

I mean, Nintendo has done it before. But those were the rare exception, with a specific condition (like the game being educational)l.

Only the Nintendo Wii Version would have Nintendo Characters, but If you want better graphics, the 3DS would be a better choice, though it would have less Characters than the Wii Version, and the Wii Version could hold over 110 fully funtional fighting character models on a dual layer disk, (not including alt. colors) while keeping great fighting Gameplay on both Wii Remote/Nunchuk, and Classic/Gamecube Controllers, while allowing 3DS versions to connect to allow more characters on the system with a better graphics engine, the 3DS version could also run save records exclusive to each system, rather than have game card save files.

The X-Box/PS3 versions would add more Sega, Marvel, & Capcom Characters, while allowing custom fighters, & X-Box would have one of those Halo soldiers that actually has a name, as an exclusive character, While Playstation 3 has iconic game Characters like Lara Croft (Tomb Raider) & Solid Snake, and other Playstation Fill-ins

007 (James Bond) would be a good character for a Wii/3DS exclusive though!
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on March 22, 2011, 08:08:49 PM
Quote from: Tattletale1 on March 21, 2011, 09:19:07 PM
Quote from: tacopill on March 13, 2011, 07:11:46 PM


But would Nintendo be willing to partner up on a game that they know would be going to non-Nintendo Console?

I mean, Nintendo has done it before. But those were the rare exception, with a specific condition (like the game being educational)l.

Only the Nintendo Wii Version would have Nintendo Characters, but If you want better graphics, the 3DS would be a better choice, though it would have less Characters than the Wii Version, and the Wii Version could hold over 110 fully funtional fighting character models on a dual layer disk, (not including alt. colors) while keeping great fighting Gameplay on both Wii Remote/Nunchuk, and Classic/Gamecube Controllers, while allowing 3DS versions to connect to allow more characters on the system with a better graphics engine, the 3DS version could also run save records exclusive to each system, rather than have game card save files.

The X-Box/PS3 versions would add more Sega, Marvel, & Capcom Characters, while allowing custom fighters, & X-Box would have one of those Halo soldiers that actually has a name, as an exclusive character, While Playstation 3 has iconic game Characters like Lara Croft (Tomb Raider) & Solid Snake, and other Playstation Fill-ins

007 (James Bond) would be a good character for a Wii/3DS exclusive though!

Ah. that would be cool then.

And yes, 007 would be an excellent character to add in.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: Mari-Illustrious-Makinami on March 27, 2011, 11:38:38 PM
Quote from: HavocReaper48 on March 13, 2011, 03:26:08 PM
Quote from: tacopill on February 15, 2011, 08:27:55 PM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 02:57:54 AM
Quote from: Aiko-chan on February 15, 2011, 02:27:59 AM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
No s***, Sherlock.
dont have to rub it in my face
yes, that was Highly unnecessary...
(http://www.cultofmac.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/phoenix-wright-objection.jpg)

On Xbox 360 / PS3 would be better simply because they are technologically superior -- less laggy for online matches for example -- and can utilize DLC to put in even moar characters. Now, I'm not saying "HAY GAIZ WII SUX", but I think the other two consoles would be better. I mean, just look at MvC3.

Or at least, one version for 360/PS3 and a watered down port for Wii.
Wii can have DLC too.
Title: Re: Nintendo vs. Capcom
Post by: tacopill on March 29, 2011, 10:59:57 PM
Quote from: Kaiba on March 27, 2011, 11:38:38 PM
Quote from: HavocReaper48 on March 13, 2011, 03:26:08 PM
Quote from: tacopill on February 15, 2011, 08:27:55 PM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 02:57:54 AM
Quote from: Aiko-chan on February 15, 2011, 02:27:59 AM
Quote from: pikachu8090 on February 15, 2011, 01:38:54 AM
if they did do this it would only be on a nintendo system
No s***, Sherlock.
dont have to rub it in my face
yes, that was Highly unnecessary...
(http://www.cultofmac.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/phoenix-wright-objection.jpg)

On Xbox 360 / PS3 would be better simply because they are technologically superior -- less laggy for online matches for example -- and can utilize DLC to put in even moar characters. Now, I'm not saying "HAY GAIZ WII SUX", but I think the other two consoles would be better. I mean, just look at MvC3.

Or at least, one version for 360/PS3 and a watered down port for Wii.
Wii can have DLC too.

Wii can have DLC, but would that require Nintendo changing instance on Online content? or simply Online-anything?