Messages

1

Membership and Affiliate Requests / Re: TouhouWiki (including En, zh, ru, es, pl, ko, etc) and MotK

« on: November 24, 2012, 06:35:25 AM »

RE: I'm sorry but I don't actually see a connection with Nintendo. Unlike Dragon Wiki, where some games where published by Nintendo, this really has nothing to do with them. Like someone already suggested, another type of affiliation could happen, but becoming a full member defies the scope of NIWA being dedicated to Nintendo.

2

NIWA Discussion / Re: StrategyWiki and Dragon Quest Wiki

« on: November 11, 2012, 03:29:58 PM »

Ok I guess so. After all there aren't many, as you rightly said, but maybe if more of the same types of members join I might bring this up again. Thank you all for replying.

3

NIWA Discussion / Re: StrategyWiki and Dragon Quest Wiki

« on: November 11, 2012, 12:38:53 PM »

Ok now I'm not asking to remove them as fully fledged members, but under each NIWA wiki there is a box with all the current members of NIWA. If that box were to just categorize the members, wouldn't it look a little more organized? If you like I will create a draft template to show what I mean.

4

NIWA Discussion / Re: StrategyWiki and Dragon Quest Wiki

« on: November 10, 2012, 04:23:16 PM »

True that, but I'm not saying they shouldn't have full membership, but maybe they should be put under a different type of membership heading. Maybe something like

Nintendo Franchises: MarioWiki, ZeldaWiki etc.   |   3rd Party Franchises: DQWiki, SonicWiki etc.   |   Fanon: Pikmin Fanon etc.   |   Other: StrategyWiki, NIWA Hub etc

Do you get what I mean ?

And your point about Wikipedia not joining makes sense so I won't bother supporting it. Although let's say it would join, it would go under the heading ''Other''. I just think the memberships are a little disorganized and should be put under separate headings to differentiate between them.

Thanks for replying btw,
Jordan

5

NIWA Discussion / StrategyWiki and Dragon Quest Wiki

« on: November 10, 2012, 12:59:31 PM »

These two wikis do not provide actual info about Nintendo. Dragon Quest is third party and StrategyWiki... that's not even a game or company owned by Nintendo. I'm not asking anyone to remove them from membership, certainly not, but shouldn't we put them into a separate class of membership like Other Nintendo-related wikis or something. We should also ask Wikipedia to join.... let's face it there are MANY hyperlinks to it so it doesn't make sense not to have them with us. What d'you think ?

Jordan

EDIT: Pikmin Fanon should also go into a separate class of membership as well.