Site Notice |
---|
|
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Clear"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:::::Anyway, if it's really important... you can remove it. Or request that i remove it, if you can't. | :::::Anyway, if it's really important... you can remove it. Or request that i remove it, if you can't. | ||
:::::{{User:Tacopill/sig}} 21:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC). | :::::{{User:Tacopill/sig}} 21:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::::No, I was just wondering if there was a reason. It's a pretty crazy thing. - [[User:Greenpickle|GP]] <sub>[[User talk:Greenpickle|talk]]</sub> 21:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:39, 6 March 2011
Missing closing tag. Oh, and why the {{void}}? (And why its use everywhere else? It seems pretty pointless to me.) - GP talk 15:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- the ifeq condition is broken up like this:
- if {{{1}}} = (i.e. nothing)
- then, output "both"
- else, output the value of {{{1}}}
- As for it's use, it clears out all the neiboring content in the cell or div. To the left, if 1 equal to "left"; to the right; if 1 equal to "right"; and both directions if 1 is undefined, blank or equal to "both".
- Tacopill (Talk) 16:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC).
- Yes, I know how #if and the HTML clear attribute work, but what do they have to do with the use of template:void here? - GP talk
- My guess would be, to capture all the possible null values that could go in {{{1}}}, which maybe an improvement over #if: (without eq). I'm not sure on this, however, since i didn't design it. I brought it over from Lylat Wiki, and the person who brought or created it there isn't currently active, there or here. Tacopill (Talk) 05:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC).
- Yes, I know how #if and the HTML clear attribute work, but what do they have to do with the use of template:void here? - GP talk
{{#if:{{{1}}}|{{void}}|....|....}}
- seems more complete, than,
{{#if:{{{1}}}||....|....}}